https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297204 An interim order made during a revision ceases to operate once the revision is finally disposed of, so the Munsiff lacked jurisdiction to enforce the expired direction and that enforcement order was unsustainable. On restoration of a suit dismissed for default, ancillary interlocutory orders do not revive automatically in every case; their revival depends on the terms of the dismissal and restoration orders, so the question required fresh consideration by the trial court. In revisional jurisdiction, the appellate order restoring the suit was not shown to suffer from material irregularity merely because a different view on the facts was possible, and interference was unwarranted. en-us Thu, 02 Mar 1967 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Sep 2021 18:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297204 An interim order made during a revision ceases to operate once the revision is finally disposed of, so the Munsiff lacked jurisdiction to enforce the expired direction and that enforcement order was unsustainable. On restoration of a suit dismissed for default, ancillary interlocutory orders do not revive automatically in every case; their revival depends on the terms of the dismissal and restoration orders, so the question required fresh consideration by the trial court. In revisional jurisdiction, the appellate order restoring the suit was not shown to suffer from material irregularity merely because a different view on the facts was possible, and interference was unwarranted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 02 Mar 1967 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297204