<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 893 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411315</link>
    <description>An application sought expeditious hearing of a customs appeal, and the Tribunal directed that the appeal be listed on 15 July 2021. During hearing, counsel raised doubts about whether the seized goods were still available with the Department, noting that inspection had been sought but not permitted. The Department&#039;s representative was asked to obtain instructions on the availability of the goods and the matter was listed accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2021 12:07:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=653624" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 893 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411315</link>
      <description>An application sought expeditious hearing of a customs appeal, and the Tribunal directed that the appeal be listed on 15 July 2021. During hearing, counsel raised doubts about whether the seized goods were still available with the Department, noting that inspection had been sought but not permitted. The Department&#039;s representative was asked to obtain instructions on the availability of the goods and the matter was listed accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411315</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>