https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411297 The appellant's claim for cenvat credit on various input services, including Mandap Keeper Service, Real Estate Agent Services, Works Contract Service, Event Management Services, and Facility Management Services, was initially partially rejected by the Commissioner. However, after considering the appellant's arguments and supporting documentation, the Commissioner concluded that the disputed input services qualified as 'input services.' The appellant's appeal was allowed, subject to invoice verification, and the claim for cenvat credit on the input services was upheld. The judgment in favor of the appellant was pronounced on 19/08/2021. en-us Thu, 19 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 10 Mar 2023 12:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411297 The appellant's claim for cenvat credit on various input services, including Mandap Keeper Service, Real Estate Agent Services, Works Contract Service, Event Management Services, and Facility Management Services, was initially partially rejected by the Commissioner. However, after considering the appellant's arguments and supporting documentation, the Commissioner concluded that the disputed input services qualified as 'input services.' The appellant's appeal was allowed, subject to invoice verification, and the claim for cenvat credit on the input services was upheld. The judgment in favor of the appellant was pronounced on 19/08/2021. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 19 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411297