<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 863 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411285</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, finding that the penalty imposition under section 271(1)(c) was unsustainable due to the lack of specificity in the penalty notice and the absence of justification for penalty imposition on a new addition not considered during assessment. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the penalty was quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2021 08:32:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=653531" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 863 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411285</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, finding that the penalty imposition under section 271(1)(c) was unsustainable due to the lack of specificity in the penalty notice and the absence of justification for penalty imposition on a new addition not considered during assessment. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the penalty was quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411285</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>