<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 846 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411268</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals and upheld CIT(A)&#039;s decisions, deleting substantial disallowances under Sections 14A and 80IC of the Income Tax Act for different assessment years. The judgments highlighted the necessity of reasonable disallowances based on facts, adherence to judicial precedents, and the non-retrospective application of Rule 8D. The ITAT supported the assessee&#039;s methods of expense allocation, emphasizing consistency with earlier rulings and rejecting the revenue&#039;s contentions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2021 08:32:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=653514" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 846 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411268</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals and upheld CIT(A)&#039;s decisions, deleting substantial disallowances under Sections 14A and 80IC of the Income Tax Act for different assessment years. The judgments highlighted the necessity of reasonable disallowances based on facts, adherence to judicial precedents, and the non-retrospective application of Rule 8D. The ITAT supported the assessee&#039;s methods of expense allocation, emphasizing consistency with earlier rulings and rejecting the revenue&#039;s contentions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411268</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>