<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 845 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411267</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, stating that penalties are not applicable when additions are based on estimates without conclusive proof of wrongdoing. The Revenue&#039;s appeal contesting the penalty deletion was dismissed due to insufficient evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2021 08:32:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=653513" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 845 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411267</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, stating that penalties are not applicable when additions are based on estimates without conclusive proof of wrongdoing. The Revenue&#039;s appeal contesting the penalty deletion was dismissed due to insufficient evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411267</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>