<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1758 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297132</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, setting aside the orders of the AO and CIT(A). The disallowance of interest on borrowed funds and the disallowance of expenditure under Section 14A were both overturned. The Tribunal emphasized the principles of commercial expediency and the necessity of actual receipt of exempt income for disallowance under Section 14A.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2021 08:31:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=653508" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1758 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297132</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, setting aside the orders of the AO and CIT(A). The disallowance of interest on borrowed funds and the disallowance of expenditure under Section 14A were both overturned. The Tribunal emphasized the principles of commercial expediency and the necessity of actual receipt of exempt income for disallowance under Section 14A.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297132</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>