<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 1455 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, CHENNAI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297143</link>
    <description>Procedural directions were issued in proceedings under Sections 230 to 232 of the Companies Act, 2013 read with Rule 16 of the Companies (Compromise, Arrangements and Amalgamation) Rules, 2016 for consideration of a scheme. The Tribunal fixed the hearing date, directed publication of notice in specified newspapers, required service on the prescribed authorities and objectors, and mandated filing of an affidavit of service before the hearing. It also provided for objections, if any, to be filed by the authorities and directed compliance with the applicable provisos under Sections 230 and 232, so the scheme petition could proceed for hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2021 08:31:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=653499" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 1455 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, CHENNAI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297143</link>
      <description>Procedural directions were issued in proceedings under Sections 230 to 232 of the Companies Act, 2013 read with Rule 16 of the Companies (Compromise, Arrangements and Amalgamation) Rules, 2016 for consideration of a scheme. The Tribunal fixed the hearing date, directed publication of notice in specified newspapers, required service on the prescribed authorities and objectors, and mandated filing of an affidavit of service before the hearing. It also provided for objections, if any, to be filed by the authorities and directed compliance with the applicable provisos under Sections 230 and 232, so the scheme petition could proceed for hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297143</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>