https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297161 Review petitions were held to be non-entertainable because they were filed after an inordinate delay of 479 days without any satisfactory explanation, and were dismissed on that ground. The Court also examined the petitions on merits and found no basis to review the earlier order dated 30.03.2017, as the substantive contentions did not disclose any ground warranting interference. The petitions were therefore rejected both for unexplained delay and for failure to establish a case for review. en-us Tue, 18 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 21 Aug 2021 08:31:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297161 Review petitions were held to be non-entertainable because they were filed after an inordinate delay of 479 days without any satisfactory explanation, and were dismissed on that ground. The Court also examined the petitions on merits and found no basis to review the earlier order dated 30.03.2017, as the substantive contentions did not disclose any ground warranting interference. The petitions were therefore rejected both for unexplained delay and for failure to establish a case for review. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 18 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297161