https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297128 Regularization of daily-wage or casual workers cannot be ordered unless a valid employer-employee relationship is established and the result remains consistent with Article 14. The analysis applies the principle in Uma Devi and states that industrial adjudication may vary contractual terms only where it does not produce an unconstitutional outcome. A prior High Court decision made before Uma Devi did not displace the governing constitutional position. On the facts described, the worker was engaged as a daily-wager and not as a regular incumbent holding the claimed post, so the direction for regularization was unsustainable and was set aside. en-us Tue, 17 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Aug 2021 15:59:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297128 Regularization of daily-wage or casual workers cannot be ordered unless a valid employer-employee relationship is established and the result remains consistent with Article 14. The analysis applies the principle in Uma Devi and states that industrial adjudication may vary contractual terms only where it does not produce an unconstitutional outcome. A prior High Court decision made before Uma Devi did not displace the governing constitutional position. On the facts described, the worker was engaged as a daily-wager and not as a regular incumbent holding the claimed post, so the direction for regularization was unsustainable and was set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 17 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297128