https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297126 The court held that it lacked the power to enforce an unregistered lease agreement and that the decision to extend the lease was within the owners' discretion. As a result, the petitioners were not entitled to an injunction to restrain eviction from the leased property. The court also addressed allegations of oppression and mismanagement, emphasizing the need for a prima facie case for interim relief under Section 403. The bench granted equitable relief but required the respondents to file counters within three weeks for further adjudication. en-us Thu, 24 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Aug 2021 14:20:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297126 The court held that it lacked the power to enforce an unregistered lease agreement and that the decision to extend the lease was within the owners' discretion. As a result, the petitioners were not entitled to an injunction to restrain eviction from the leased property. The court also addressed allegations of oppression and mismanagement, emphasizing the need for a prima facie case for interim relief under Section 403. The bench granted equitable relief but required the respondents to file counters within three weeks for further adjudication. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 24 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297126