https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297124 Award of advocate's fee and costs by a Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, fixed by reference to the Civil Rules of Practice only as an analogous guide, was held not to justify interference under Article 226. Costs are a matter of judicial discretion and writ interference is limited to cases where that discretion is exercised perversely, arbitrarily, vindictively, or without application of mind. The Tribunal had not treated the Civil Rules as binding, and the fee scale was used only to determine quantum. As the award in favour of the deceased's legal heirs was neither unauthorized nor unfair, the challenge to the costs order failed. en-us Mon, 31 Mar 1986 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Aug 2021 11:23:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297124 Award of advocate's fee and costs by a Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, fixed by reference to the Civil Rules of Practice only as an analogous guide, was held not to justify interference under Article 226. Costs are a matter of judicial discretion and writ interference is limited to cases where that discretion is exercised perversely, arbitrarily, vindictively, or without application of mind. The Tribunal had not treated the Civil Rules as binding, and the fee scale was used only to determine quantum. As the award in favour of the deceased's legal heirs was neither unauthorized nor unfair, the challenge to the costs order failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 31 Mar 1986 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297124