<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (7) TMI 68 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26345</link>
    <description>For penalty under the Wealth-tax Act, the applicable law is the law in force on the date the return is filed, not the law prevailing on the valuation date. Applying that principle, the Tribunal&#039;s approach was incorrect and the penalty had to be computed by reference to the filing date. The analysis followed prior binding authority and the Supreme Court decision relied upon, confirming that delay in filing does not shift the governing legal position to the valuation date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 13:10:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=65343" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (7) TMI 68 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26345</link>
      <description>For penalty under the Wealth-tax Act, the applicable law is the law in force on the date the return is filed, not the law prevailing on the valuation date. Applying that principle, the Tribunal&#039;s approach was incorrect and the penalty had to be computed by reference to the filing date. The analysis followed prior binding authority and the Supreme Court decision relied upon, confirming that delay in filing does not shift the governing legal position to the valuation date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26345</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>