<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (7) TMI 67 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26344</link>
    <description>The High Court, following the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in Maya Rani Punj&#039;s case, held that penalties should be imposed according to the amended provisions effective from April 1, 1969. The Tribunal&#039;s initial decision that penalties could not exceed 50% of the tax was overruled. The outcome favored the Revenue, with the question answered in the negative against the assessee. Each party was left to bear their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 13:08:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=65342" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (7) TMI 67 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26344</link>
      <description>The High Court, following the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in Maya Rani Punj&#039;s case, held that penalties should be imposed according to the amended provisions effective from April 1, 1969. The Tribunal&#039;s initial decision that penalties could not exceed 50% of the tax was overruled. The outcome favored the Revenue, with the question answered in the negative against the assessee. Each party was left to bear their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26344</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>