<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 819 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411241</link>
    <description>Clause 3(1) of Notification No. 20/2008-Central Excise allows a manufacturer to seek fixation of a special rate where actual value addition justifies a rate above the table rate. Where such an application has already been filed, coercive recovery of refund on the basis of the default notified rates should not proceed until the competent authority first decides that request. The department must examine the special-rate application and then proceed in accordance with law after determination of the applicable rate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2021 12:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=653394" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 819 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411241</link>
      <description>Clause 3(1) of Notification No. 20/2008-Central Excise allows a manufacturer to seek fixation of a special rate where actual value addition justifies a rate above the table rate. Where such an application has already been filed, coercive recovery of refund on the basis of the default notified rates should not proceed until the competent authority first decides that request. The department must examine the special-rate application and then proceed in accordance with law after determination of the applicable rate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411241</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>