<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 805 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411227</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) under Section 263, holding that the Assessing Officer (AO) had conducted adequate inquiries. The Tribunal found that the AO&#039;s order was not erroneous or prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue. It was concluded that the PCIT failed to provide any incriminating evidence to support the receipt of on-money, and the appeals filed by the assessee were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2021 17:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=653380" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 805 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411227</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) under Section 263, holding that the Assessing Officer (AO) had conducted adequate inquiries. The Tribunal found that the AO&#039;s order was not erroneous or prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue. It was concluded that the PCIT failed to provide any incriminating evidence to support the receipt of on-money, and the appeals filed by the assessee were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411227</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>