<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 799 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411221</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the denial of CENVAT credit on capital goods. It held that Rule 6(4) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, did not apply as the capital goods were used for manufacturing both dutiable and exempted goods. The appellant&#039;s simultaneous availment of multiple exemption notifications was deemed valid, as they paid duty on some clearances. The Tribunal emphasized the appellant&#039;s entitlement to CENVAT credit, consistent with previous rulings, and granted consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2021 08:07:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=653374" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 799 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411221</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the denial of CENVAT credit on capital goods. It held that Rule 6(4) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, did not apply as the capital goods were used for manufacturing both dutiable and exempted goods. The appellant&#039;s simultaneous availment of multiple exemption notifications was deemed valid, as they paid duty on some clearances. The Tribunal emphasized the appellant&#039;s entitlement to CENVAT credit, consistent with previous rulings, and granted consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411221</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>