<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (7) TMI 65 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26339</link>
    <description>An adjudicating authority must possess jurisdiction when the final order is made, not merely when proceedings begin. Because the amendment effective from 1 April 1971 had withdrawn the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner&#039;s competence before the penalty order was passed on 9 February 1977, the penalty order was not legally sustainable and was held invalid in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 13:01:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=65337" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (7) TMI 65 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26339</link>
      <description>An adjudicating authority must possess jurisdiction when the final order is made, not merely when proceedings begin. Because the amendment effective from 1 April 1971 had withdrawn the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner&#039;s competence before the penalty order was passed on 9 February 1977, the penalty order was not legally sustainable and was held invalid in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26339</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>