<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (6) TMI 1056 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297120</link>
    <description>The Bombay HC granted an ad-interim stay on reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 148 for assessment year 2013-2014, pending further hearing. The petition challenged the notice on the ground that the mandatory procedure introduced from 1 April 2021, including inquiry and an opportunity of being heard under Section 148A, had not been followed before issuing the reassessment notice. The Revenue sought time to file a reply, and the matter was directed to be listed again.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2021 23:19:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=653363" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (6) TMI 1056 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297120</link>
      <description>The Bombay HC granted an ad-interim stay on reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 148 for assessment year 2013-2014, pending further hearing. The petition challenged the notice on the ground that the mandatory procedure introduced from 1 April 2021, including inquiry and an opportunity of being heard under Section 148A, had not been followed before issuing the reassessment notice. The Revenue sought time to file a reply, and the matter was directed to be listed again.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297120</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>