<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (7) TMI 20 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26338</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee on both issues, affirming the legality of the partial partition of the Hindu undivided family and the genuine formation of the partnership firm post partition. The court emphasized the provisions of Hindu law and relevant case law supporting the assessee&#039;s arguments, ultimately deciding against the Revenue department without imposing any costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jul 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 12:59:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=65336" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (7) TMI 20 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26338</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee on both issues, affirming the legality of the partial partition of the Hindu undivided family and the genuine formation of the partnership firm post partition. The court emphasized the provisions of Hindu law and relevant case law supporting the assessee&#039;s arguments, ultimately deciding against the Revenue department without imposing any costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jul 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26338</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>