<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 2004 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297119</link>
    <description>When objections are raised to a Commissioner&#039;s report, the objecting party must be given a fair opportunity to examine the Commissioner before the report is finally relied on or rejected. The report cannot be conclusively acted upon while that evidentiary challenge remains unresolved. The question whether the report should be scrapped, or whether a re-visit or appointment of another Commissioner is required, must be considered only after such examination and after the objections are assessed. The petitioner was therefore entitled to examine the Commissioner, and the challenge to the report was remitted to the trial court for fresh consideration thereafter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2021 23:18:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=653352" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 2004 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297119</link>
      <description>When objections are raised to a Commissioner&#039;s report, the objecting party must be given a fair opportunity to examine the Commissioner before the report is finally relied on or rejected. The report cannot be conclusively acted upon while that evidentiary challenge remains unresolved. The question whether the report should be scrapped, or whether a re-visit or appointment of another Commissioner is required, must be considered only after such examination and after the objections are assessed. The petitioner was therefore entitled to examine the Commissioner, and the challenge to the report was remitted to the trial court for fresh consideration thereafter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297119</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>