<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 779 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411201</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Enforcement Directorate&#039;s attachment order under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. The court held that the petitioners lacked legal standing as registered purchasers of the property and advised them to seek appropriate forums for implementing the Rajasthan Real Estate Regulatory Authority&#039;s order revoking the project&#039;s registration. The court found that the Enforcement Directorate&#039;s attachment did not interfere with the RERA order aimed at protecting the interests of the petitioners. As a result, the writ petition and all pending applications were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2022 11:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=653307" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 779 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411201</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Enforcement Directorate&#039;s attachment order under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. The court held that the petitioners lacked legal standing as registered purchasers of the property and advised them to seek appropriate forums for implementing the Rajasthan Real Estate Regulatory Authority&#039;s order revoking the project&#039;s registration. The court found that the Enforcement Directorate&#039;s attachment did not interfere with the RERA order aimed at protecting the interests of the petitioners. As a result, the writ petition and all pending applications were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411201</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>