https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297093 Condonation of delay requires a litigant to establish sufficient cause through true, complete and reliable facts. Contradictory medical certificates, suppression of material facts including incarceration during the relevant period, and fabricated documents undermine the request for discretionary relief. A party approaching the court with unclean hands and false explanations cannot rely on sufficient cause to obtain indulgence. The refusal to condone delay in filing an appeal against conviction was therefore upheld, with no revisional interference warranted. en-us Tue, 02 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Aug 2021 18:46:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297093 Condonation of delay requires a litigant to establish sufficient cause through true, complete and reliable facts. Contradictory medical certificates, suppression of material facts including incarceration during the relevant period, and fabricated documents undermine the request for discretionary relief. A party approaching the court with unclean hands and false explanations cannot rely on sufficient cause to obtain indulgence. The refusal to condone delay in filing an appeal against conviction was therefore upheld, with no revisional interference warranted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 02 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297093