<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (10) TMI 7 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26326</link>
    <description>The court held that the death of a partner did not result in a dissolution of the partnership but only a change in the firm&#039;s constitution, allowing for the continuation of business with the admission of the deceased partner&#039;s minor son. A single assessment for the full year was deemed justified due to the firm&#039;s constitutional change. Registration for a specific period was denied as there was no dissolution, only a change in the firm&#039;s constitution. The court ruled against the assessee on all issues, affirming the continuity of the partnership and supporting the single assessment decision while denying registration for the specific period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 12:25:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=65324" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (10) TMI 7 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26326</link>
      <description>The court held that the death of a partner did not result in a dissolution of the partnership but only a change in the firm&#039;s constitution, allowing for the continuation of business with the admission of the deceased partner&#039;s minor son. A single assessment for the full year was deemed justified due to the firm&#039;s constitutional change. Registration for a specific period was denied as there was no dissolution, only a change in the firm&#039;s constitution. The court ruled against the assessee on all issues, affirming the continuity of the partnership and supporting the single assessment decision while denying registration for the specific period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26326</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>