<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (12) TMI 15 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26324</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the confiscated gold&#039;s value should be considered a business loss directly related to smuggling activities. The assessee was entitled to set off the loss against the income brought to tax, contrary to the Tribunal&#039;s decision. The Supreme Court&#039;s ruling supported this, emphasizing that confiscation in pursuit of illegal activities constitutes a loss incidental to the business. Thus, the assessee prevailed, and the first issue was decided in their favor, making the second issue moot.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 12:22:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=65322" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (12) TMI 15 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26324</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the confiscated gold&#039;s value should be considered a business loss directly related to smuggling activities. The assessee was entitled to set off the loss against the income brought to tax, contrary to the Tribunal&#039;s decision. The Supreme Court&#039;s ruling supported this, emphasizing that confiscation in pursuit of illegal activities constitutes a loss incidental to the business. Thus, the assessee prevailed, and the first issue was decided in their favor, making the second issue moot.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26324</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>