https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297088 SC dismissed the plaintiff's suit involving 'Sethiya & Co.' dissolution. The court found the agreement void due to material alterations, lack of firm registration under Section 69 of Partnership Act, and absence of necessary parties. The plaintiff's claims were rejected, with each party bearing their own legal costs. en-us Wed, 20 Oct 1976 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 25 Apr 2025 14:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297088 SC dismissed the plaintiff's suit involving 'Sethiya & Co.' dissolution. The court found the agreement void due to material alterations, lack of firm registration under Section 69 of Partnership Act, and absence of necessary parties. The plaintiff's claims were rejected, with each party bearing their own legal costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 20 Oct 1976 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297088