https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297087 The court found the discharge plea regarding certain promissory notes to be untrue. The plaintiff was entitled to a decree based on those notes. The court upheld the validity of other promissory notes and rejected claims of material alterations and excessive interest. The second defendant's liability under a letter of guarantee was affirmed, as the guarantee had not been revoked properly. The court dismissed arguments of material alterations and filling of blanks in the notes. An instalment decree was set aside due to non-payment. Appeal No. 520 of 1972 was dismissed, and the appellants were ordered to pay court fees, while Appeal No. 779 of 1970 was allowed with costs. en-us Tue, 16 Mar 1976 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Aug 2021 11:44:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297087 The court found the discharge plea regarding certain promissory notes to be untrue. The plaintiff was entitled to a decree based on those notes. The court upheld the validity of other promissory notes and rejected claims of material alterations and excessive interest. The second defendant's liability under a letter of guarantee was affirmed, as the guarantee had not been revoked properly. The court dismissed arguments of material alterations and filling of blanks in the notes. An instalment decree was set aside due to non-payment. Appeal No. 520 of 1972 was dismissed, and the appellants were ordered to pay court fees, while Appeal No. 779 of 1970 was allowed with costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 16 Mar 1976 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297087