<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 747 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411169</link>
    <description>The appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed, affirming the decision of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and following previous rulings by the ITAT Delhi. The assessee&#039;s claim of Rs. 24,01,00,000 under Section 36(1)(viia) for provision for Bad &amp;amp; Doubtful Debts was allowed, based on legislative intent and judicial precedents supporting deductions for rural advances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2021 09:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=653207" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 747 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411169</link>
      <description>The appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed, affirming the decision of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and following previous rulings by the ITAT Delhi. The assessee&#039;s claim of Rs. 24,01,00,000 under Section 36(1)(viia) for provision for Bad &amp;amp; Doubtful Debts was allowed, based on legislative intent and judicial precedents supporting deductions for rural advances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411169</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>