<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 742 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411164</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld its decision to remand the matter to the Assessing Officer for further verification and dismissed the assessee&#039;s application for rectification regarding the deduction of interest expenditure under section 36(1)(iii) of the Act. The Tribunal found that the application seeking a review of the order was beyond the scope of rectification and emphasized the need for factual verification regarding the availability of self-owned funds with the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2021 09:29:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=653202" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 742 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411164</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld its decision to remand the matter to the Assessing Officer for further verification and dismissed the assessee&#039;s application for rectification regarding the deduction of interest expenditure under section 36(1)(iii) of the Act. The Tribunal found that the application seeking a review of the order was beyond the scope of rectification and emphasized the need for factual verification regarding the availability of self-owned funds with the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411164</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>