<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (11) TMI 8 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26321</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, finding insufficient evidence to support the additions made by the Income-tax Officer regarding interest income and income from lorry hire for the assessment year 1964-65. The court held that the basis used for estimating interest income was arbitrary and unsustainable, and there was a lack of material to justify the addition of lorry hire income. Consequently, the court directed each party to bear their own costs in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 12:18:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=65319" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (11) TMI 8 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26321</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, finding insufficient evidence to support the additions made by the Income-tax Officer regarding interest income and income from lorry hire for the assessment year 1964-65. The court held that the basis used for estimating interest income was arbitrary and unsustainable, and there was a lack of material to justify the addition of lorry hire income. Consequently, the court directed each party to bear their own costs in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26321</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>