<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 729 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS - MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411151</link>
    <description>The ruling classified API supari, chikni supari, unflavoured supari, and flavoured supari under heading 0802 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, based on the processes undertaken on raw areca nuts. Boiled supari&#039;s classification was not determined due to existing decisions. The products did not qualify for the exemption under Notification No. 50/2017-Cus., dated 30.06.2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2022 15:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=653189" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 729 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS - MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411151</link>
      <description>The ruling classified API supari, chikni supari, unflavoured supari, and flavoured supari under heading 0802 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, based on the processes undertaken on raw areca nuts. Boiled supari&#039;s classification was not determined due to existing decisions. The products did not qualify for the exemption under Notification No. 50/2017-Cus., dated 30.06.2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411151</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>