https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411142 Repeated invocation of inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC in relation to the same complaint proceedings was found unjustified where earlier Section 482 proceedings had already been dismissed, no change in circumstances was shown, and the applicants had continued to avoid appearance despite repeated warrants. The coercive process under Sections 82 and 83 CrPC was issued after persistent non-appearance, so no ground existed to interfere with the trial court's process. A suggested settlement did not alter the position because the pending complaint proceedings did not disclose any basis for intervention. The petition was therefore held not maintainable on the facts and was dismissed. en-us Thu, 15 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Aug 2021 09:28:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411142 Repeated invocation of inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC in relation to the same complaint proceedings was found unjustified where earlier Section 482 proceedings had already been dismissed, no change in circumstances was shown, and the applicants had continued to avoid appearance despite repeated warrants. The coercive process under Sections 82 and 83 CrPC was issued after persistent non-appearance, so no ground existed to interfere with the trial court's process. A suggested settlement did not alter the position because the pending complaint proceedings did not disclose any basis for intervention. The petition was therefore held not maintainable on the facts and was dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 15 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411142