<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 717 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411139</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s refund claim and entitlement to interest on delayed refund, setting aside the rejection based on limitation grounds. It clarified that no fresh refund application is needed at each stage of adjudication, citing relevant case law. The appellant was deemed entitled to interest on the delayed refund per the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling. The decision was made on 16/08/2021.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2022 17:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=653177" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 717 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411139</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s refund claim and entitlement to interest on delayed refund, setting aside the rejection based on limitation grounds. It clarified that no fresh refund application is needed at each stage of adjudication, citing relevant case law. The appellant was deemed entitled to interest on the delayed refund per the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling. The decision was made on 16/08/2021.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411139</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>