<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 697 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411119</link>
    <description>The amendment to the Cenvat Credit Rules removed the earlier restriction on using AED (GSI) credit for payment of other excise duties, and credit legitimately earned on duty-paid inputs was therefore required to be restored. The Tribunal also treated the issue as governed by binding precedent in the assessee&#039;s own case, and distinguished the Larger Bench refund ruling as inapplicable on these facts. On that basis, the disallowance of credit, along with the consequential interest and penalty, was held unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2021 15:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=653157" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 697 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411119</link>
      <description>The amendment to the Cenvat Credit Rules removed the earlier restriction on using AED (GSI) credit for payment of other excise duties, and credit legitimately earned on duty-paid inputs was therefore required to be restored. The Tribunal also treated the issue as governed by binding precedent in the assessee&#039;s own case, and distinguished the Larger Bench refund ruling as inapplicable on these facts. On that basis, the disallowance of credit, along with the consequential interest and penalty, was held unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411119</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>