<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 682 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , MUMBAI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411104</link>
    <description>A scheme of amalgamation was sanctioned where the petitioners complied with the Companies Act, 2013 and the Tribunal&#039;s directions, and the objections raised on accounting treatment, appointed date, notices, capital reduction, tax compliance and RERA concerns were satisfactorily addressed. The Official Liquidator reported that the transferor company&#039;s affairs had been properly conducted, and the Tribunal found the scheme fair, reasonable and not contrary to law or public policy. The appointed date was approved as 1 April 2019, the transferor company was directed to stand dissolved without winding up, and consequential directions were issued for publication, stamping and filing with the Registrar of Companies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2021 09:26:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=653142" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 682 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , MUMBAI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411104</link>
      <description>A scheme of amalgamation was sanctioned where the petitioners complied with the Companies Act, 2013 and the Tribunal&#039;s directions, and the objections raised on accounting treatment, appointed date, notices, capital reduction, tax compliance and RERA concerns were satisfactorily addressed. The Official Liquidator reported that the transferor company&#039;s affairs had been properly conducted, and the Tribunal found the scheme fair, reasonable and not contrary to law or public policy. The appointed date was approved as 1 April 2019, the transferor company was directed to stand dissolved without winding up, and consequential directions were issued for publication, stamping and filing with the Registrar of Companies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411104</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>