<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 1453 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297067</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s order on all contested grounds. It reaffirmed the applicability of Section 45(3) over Section 50C for capital contribution transactions and clarified the conditions for advances to be treated as deemed dividends under Section 2(22)(e).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2021 09:26:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=653134" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 1453 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297067</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s order on all contested grounds. It reaffirmed the applicability of Section 45(3) over Section 50C for capital contribution transactions and clarified the conditions for advances to be treated as deemed dividends under Section 2(22)(e).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297067</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>