https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26315 A coparcener's admission to partnership in a representative capacity, as found by the Tribunal on surrounding facts and circumstances, did not raise a referable question of law under section 256 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The proposed questions merely sought to reopen that factual conclusion, and no separate legal issue emerged from the framing of those questions. On that basis, the petition was dismissed. en-us Thu, 31 Oct 1985 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 Feb 2010 11:27:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26315 A coparcener's admission to partnership in a representative capacity, as found by the Tribunal on surrounding facts and circumstances, did not raise a referable question of law under section 256 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The proposed questions merely sought to reopen that factual conclusion, and no separate legal issue emerged from the framing of those questions. On that basis, the petition was dismissed. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 31 Oct 1985 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26315