https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297076 In Section 9 proceedings under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the HC held that it may direct payment of admitted or prima facie established rent as an interim measure of protection, guided by the principles underlying Order XV-A and Order XXXIX Rule 10 CPC. A claimed oral variation of a written lease was rejected at the interim stage under Section 92 of the Indian Evidence Act, and the alleged free-rent period was treated as a drafting issue that could not override the lease terms. Finding a strong prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable injury in favour of the lessor, the Court sustained the directions for deposit of outstanding rent and left final adjudication to arbitration. en-us Fri, 22 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Aug 2021 09:26:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297076 In Section 9 proceedings under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the HC held that it may direct payment of admitted or prima facie established rent as an interim measure of protection, guided by the principles underlying Order XV-A and Order XXXIX Rule 10 CPC. A claimed oral variation of a written lease was rejected at the interim stage under Section 92 of the Indian Evidence Act, and the alleged free-rent period was treated as a drafting issue that could not override the lease terms. Finding a strong prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable injury in favour of the lessor, the Court sustained the directions for deposit of outstanding rent and left final adjudication to arbitration. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 22 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297076