https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297075 Preventive detention was held unsustainable where the detaining authority had participated in the sponsoring process, showing predetermination and lack of independent application of mind. Unexplained delay in dealing with the detenus' representations also violated the constitutional safeguard of prompt consideration and invalidated the detention. Reliance on bail granted in an unrelated case was treated as irrelevant to the likelihood of release on bail and disclosed non-application of mind. Contradictions between the adverse case, the ground case, and the arrest and confession materials were not reconciled, vitiating subjective satisfaction. The detenus were directed to be released forthwith unless required in any other case. en-us Thu, 11 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Aug 2021 09:26:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297075 Preventive detention was held unsustainable where the detaining authority had participated in the sponsoring process, showing predetermination and lack of independent application of mind. Unexplained delay in dealing with the detenus' representations also violated the constitutional safeguard of prompt consideration and invalidated the detention. Reliance on bail granted in an unrelated case was treated as irrelevant to the likelihood of release on bail and disclosed non-application of mind. Contradictions between the adverse case, the ground case, and the arrest and confession materials were not reconciled, vitiating subjective satisfaction. The detenus were directed to be released forthwith unless required in any other case. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 11 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297075