https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411101 Preventive detention was found vulnerable where the detaining authority had prior involvement in the same matter, undermining independent subjective satisfaction. Unexplained delay between the alleged prejudicial activity and the detention orders broke the live and proximate link required for detention. The Court also treated non-consideration of retracted statements, withheld vital material, and omitted circumstances bearing on future propensity as fatal to the satisfaction process. Delay in deciding representations was likewise inconsistent with the prompt consideration required by Article 22(5). Mechanical reproduction of grounds from another case further demonstrated non-application of mind, rendering the detention orders unsustainable. en-us Fri, 06 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Aug 2021 21:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411101 Preventive detention was found vulnerable where the detaining authority had prior involvement in the same matter, undermining independent subjective satisfaction. Unexplained delay between the alleged prejudicial activity and the detention orders broke the live and proximate link required for detention. The Court also treated non-consideration of retracted statements, withheld vital material, and omitted circumstances bearing on future propensity as fatal to the satisfaction process. Delay in deciding representations was likewise inconsistent with the prompt consideration required by Article 22(5). Mechanical reproduction of grounds from another case further demonstrated non-application of mind, rendering the detention orders unsustainable. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 06 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411101