<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (9) TMI 3 - PATNA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26304</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the interest payment made by an assessee-company to old creditors related to its directors, ruling that it did not fall under section 40(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court held that the interest paid was not considered remuneration or a benefit to a relative of a director, and thus should be allowed as a deduction under section 36(1)(iii). The decision favored the assessee, with each party bearing its own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 11:10:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=65302" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (9) TMI 3 - PATNA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26304</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the interest payment made by an assessee-company to old creditors related to its directors, ruling that it did not fall under section 40(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court held that the interest paid was not considered remuneration or a benefit to a relative of a director, and thus should be allowed as a deduction under section 36(1)(iii). The decision favored the assessee, with each party bearing its own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26304</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>