<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 677 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411099</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the revision proceedings under Section 263(1) of the Income Tax Act were time-barred as they were initiated beyond the prescribed limitation period of two years from the date of the original assessment order. The Court emphasized the importance of adhering to the limitation period and considering issues from the original assessment order when determining the applicability of the limitation period for revision proceedings. The tax case appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2022 17:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=653007" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 677 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411099</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the revision proceedings under Section 263(1) of the Income Tax Act were time-barred as they were initiated beyond the prescribed limitation period of two years from the date of the original assessment order. The Court emphasized the importance of adhering to the limitation period and considering issues from the original assessment order when determining the applicability of the limitation period for revision proceedings. The tax case appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411099</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>