<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (7) TMI 9 - PATNA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26301</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Income-tax Officer&#039;s addition of Rs. 10,000 as income of the assessee under section 40A(3) of the Income-tax Act for cash payments without satisfactory explanation. The court found the Tribunal&#039;s decision reasonable, affirming the Revenue&#039;s justification for adding back the amount under rule 6DD(j) of the Income-tax Rules. The court ruled in favor of the Commissioner, denying relief to the assessee for the assessment year 1971-72.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 11:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=65299" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (7) TMI 9 - PATNA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26301</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Income-tax Officer&#039;s addition of Rs. 10,000 as income of the assessee under section 40A(3) of the Income-tax Act for cash payments without satisfactory explanation. The court found the Tribunal&#039;s decision reasonable, affirming the Revenue&#039;s justification for adding back the amount under rule 6DD(j) of the Income-tax Rules. The court ruled in favor of the Commissioner, denying relief to the assessee for the assessment year 1971-72.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26301</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>