https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411076 The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal against the order demanding service tax, interest, and penalties for construction works, dropping the demand for most works except one and modifying penalties. The case was remanded for quantification. The Principal Commissioner re-quantified the amounts, leading to disputes over interest and penalties. The appellant challenged delays and discrepancies in calculations, including penalties for contravention of tax rules. The Department defended penalties citing Tribunal directions, while a divergence on interest quantification required reassessment within a specified timeline. en-us Mon, 16 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Aug 2021 09:02:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411076 The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal against the order demanding service tax, interest, and penalties for construction works, dropping the demand for most works except one and modifying penalties. The case was remanded for quantification. The Principal Commissioner re-quantified the amounts, leading to disputes over interest and penalties. The appellant challenged delays and discrepancies in calculations, including penalties for contravention of tax rules. The Department defended penalties citing Tribunal directions, while a divergence on interest quantification required reassessment within a specified timeline. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 16 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411076