https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26300 The court held that the Appellate Assistant Commissioner had jurisdiction to hear an appeal against the Income-tax Officer's decision regarding the continuation of registration under section 184(7) for the assessment years in question. Relying on previous cases, the court determined that the term "status" in section 246(c) encompassed all categories of firms, allowing appeals against the determination of a registered firm's status. The decision favored the assessee, directing the Revenue to pay a hearing fee and transmit the judgment to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal. en-us Thu, 08 May 1986 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 Feb 2010 11:04:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26300 The court held that the Appellate Assistant Commissioner had jurisdiction to hear an appeal against the Income-tax Officer's decision regarding the continuation of registration under section 184(7) for the assessment years in question. Relying on previous cases, the court determined that the term "status" in section 246(c) encompassed all categories of firms, allowing appeals against the determination of a registered firm's status. The decision favored the assessee, directing the Revenue to pay a hearing fee and transmit the judgment to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 08 May 1986 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26300