<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 637 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411059</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit on collateral management charges for loans and advances was held admissible where the lending activity was not treated as an exempt service merely because interest on loans was outside service tax. The notice also failed on limitation because it was issued after a substantial delay despite proper books, statutory registers, and regular return filing, with no suppression of facts or contumacious conduct shown. On that basis, the demand was not sustainable and consequential relief followed in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2022 16:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=652964" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 637 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411059</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit on collateral management charges for loans and advances was held admissible where the lending activity was not treated as an exempt service merely because interest on loans was outside service tax. The notice also failed on limitation because it was issued after a substantial delay despite proper books, statutory registers, and regular return filing, with no suppression of facts or contumacious conduct shown. On that basis, the demand was not sustainable and consequential relief followed in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411059</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>