<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 628 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411050</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, citing the existence of a pre-existing dispute raised by the corporate debtor, supported by evidence of quality issues and debt acknowledgment. The Tribunal emphasized the need for further investigation, leading to the rejection of the application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2021 09:00:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=652955" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 628 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411050</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, citing the existence of a pre-existing dispute raised by the corporate debtor, supported by evidence of quality issues and debt acknowledgment. The Tribunal emphasized the need for further investigation, leading to the rejection of the application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411050</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>