https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297038 The High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the Appellants-Revenue under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as no substantial question of law arose from the ITAT order for A.Y. 2010-11. The court emphasized that dissatisfaction with factual findings alone is not sufficient to invoke section 260A, highlighting the need for substantial questions of law to be based on legal provisions or significant issues like treaty interpretations or BEPS, rather than factual disagreements on comparables selection. en-us Wed, 25 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 16 Aug 2021 21:16:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297038 The High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the Appellants-Revenue under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as no substantial question of law arose from the ITAT order for A.Y. 2010-11. The court emphasized that dissatisfaction with factual findings alone is not sufficient to invoke section 260A, highlighting the need for substantial questions of law to be based on legal provisions or significant issues like treaty interpretations or BEPS, rather than factual disagreements on comparables selection. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 25 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297038