<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (12) TMI 47 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26295</link>
    <description>The High Court declined to answer a question regarding the deductibility of maintenance expenditure under a will before ascertaining assessable income. The court emphasized it cannot sit in judgment over earlier orders and that the question referred did not actually arise for determination. Therefore, the court concluded there was no justification for answering the question and directed the parties to bear their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 10:55:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=65293" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (12) TMI 47 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26295</link>
      <description>The High Court declined to answer a question regarding the deductibility of maintenance expenditure under a will before ascertaining assessable income. The court emphasized it cannot sit in judgment over earlier orders and that the question referred did not actually arise for determination. Therefore, the court concluded there was no justification for answering the question and directed the parties to bear their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26295</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>