https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297024 Section 362 of the Code of Criminal Procedure bars a court from altering or reviewing a signed judgment or final order, except to correct clerical or arithmetical errors. The provision reflects the functus officio principle: once a matter is finally disposed of, the court cannot reopen it unless a specific statutory power permits further interference. The inherent power under Section 482 cannot be used to override this express prohibition. A summary dismissal of a revision after hearing the petitioner or counsel remains a final adjudication, and the matter cannot be revived merely because notice was not issued to the other side. en-us Mon, 23 Aug 1976 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 16 Aug 2021 10:39:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297024 Section 362 of the Code of Criminal Procedure bars a court from altering or reviewing a signed judgment or final order, except to correct clerical or arithmetical errors. The provision reflects the functus officio principle: once a matter is finally disposed of, the court cannot reopen it unless a specific statutory power permits further interference. The inherent power under Section 482 cannot be used to override this express prohibition. A summary dismissal of a revision after hearing the petitioner or counsel remains a final adjudication, and the matter cannot be revived merely because notice was not issued to the other side. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 23 Aug 1976 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297024